Presentation of the White Paper on the Future of European Defence in the European Parliament

Plenary session of the European Parliament, 11 March, 2025
SPEECH DURING THE PLENARY DEBATE
Dear President, Honourable Members.
Thank you for putting this debate on the future of European Defence on the agenda.
This is one of the most important debates in the history of this House. Because the days we are living through are days which will define the history of Europe and of the EU.
This is a once in a generation moment. We face a clear and present danger, seen by none of us in our lifetimes. More than ever, Europe must prepare for the worst to prevent the worst: The possibility of military aggression against us. Such preparation is the only way to deter the worst.
Russia’s war industry is operating at full blast. Russia could be ready for a confrontation with NATO in 5 years or less. American actions are a wakeup call – the policy shift and pivot towards Asia. Geopolitical reality is changing before our eyes.
More than ever, we must stand on our two feet. Take charge of our own defence and deterrence. More than ever, we must support and defend Ukraine. Yes, there must be peace. But a strong peace. Peace through real strength. A peace with Ukraine and Europe at the table. A just peace – not just a pause for Russia to lick its wounds. And start a new war. A bigger war. A strong peace also means a strong Europe, able to deter aggression and prevent war.
To do that we must completely overhaul our defence industry. Because the gaps are colossal between the defences we have and the defences we need to protect our people. Already now there’s a lack of thousands of tanks, fighting vehicles, armoured vehicles, pieces of artillery, as we can guess from publications about NATO’s capability targets. A shortfall of 500 billion euro at least. Even more hundreds of billions are needed for real air defence, space defence and military mobility.
Member States need to invest massively to fill these gaps. And the EU will support Member States: with EU added value; European scale; European coordination; European money; European laws.
This Commission put Defence on the top of the European agenda. Since before our mandate even started. Defence was top priority in President von der Leyen’s political guidelines. And she appointed me as the first ever EU defence Commissioner. She charged me in my mission letter – with HRVP Kallas – to present a White Paper on the Future of European Defence.
And since the very first day of my mandate we’ve been working non-stop in the College, with my services, in plenty of seminars, conferences and discussions, including in this House. I have met many ministers, members of parliament, CEOs of defence and space industry. We received many contributions, including your resolution.
These months of discussions helped prepare the ground. Allowing us to present key proposals already last week with the historical decisions on ReArm Europe far ahead of the White Paper’s publication.
Because if history is running, we can’t be walking.
Last week President von der Leyen presented the Rearm Europe plan, unanimously approved two days later by a historic European Council. With key proposals to supercharge our defence spending up to 800 billion euro. Such as:
- Activating the national escape clause of the stability and growth pact.
- A new EU instrument to support Member States with loans.
- Redirecting existing European funding for defence – like cohesion funds.
- Encouraging Investment by private banks. And the European Investment Bank.
We welcome the leaders’ call to reconsider excluded activities, to increase funding into defence. And we encourage Member States to continue support for Ukraine – by buying arms in Ukraine, with Ukraine and for Ukraine. Like Denmark and Czechia are already doing. All initiatives that ensure Ukraine can stay strong and defend itself need to be supported.
We will present full legal proposals before the next European Council. It is not enough to spend more. Spend more in a fragmented market – will only fragment it more. Spend more can also mean more outside the EU – this will only increase our dependence.
We need to spend better, together and European.
Work together on research and development. Build more bridges between civil and military research and innovation. Artificial intelligence, quantum technology will change the nature of war. So we must leverage deep tech to level up defence readiness.
We must work on priority areas for action at EU level in the field of capabilities, like:
- air and missile defence;
- strategic enablers, including in relation to space;
- Military Mobility.
This is where EU programs for joint procurement and joint development, programs like EDIP, are crucial. With these programs we can incentivize Member States to spend together; to overcome fragmentation, to spend smart and to spend European. This is how we will build up our own European defence industry.
Defence industry is no ordinary industry, but a resource for our defence.
We’re encouraging joint procurement to give European industry the big orders it needs, to simplify production, to reduce the price of armaments, reduce fragmentation.
We will simplify our laws and rules to remove all obstacles that stand in the way of ramping up our defence industry.
All that is what the White Paper is about. And now we need to scale up and speed up.
I know this House strongly supports European Defence, as President Metsola made clear, as many of you made clear to me last week when I spoke with the ITRE committee.
This is why I call on you urgently to agree the Parliament’s negotiating position on EDIP (the European Defence Industry Programme), which will allow us to be much more effective in bringing EU added value, to help Member States spend their national defence money in the most useful way. I welcome the Council’s call to conclude negotiations as soon as possible.
EDIP was proposed a year ago. History will not wait for us. Putin will not wait for us.
Next week, we will present the White Paper to rethink European defence at this strategic moment.
Let me close with some inspiration from history. I recently read the memoirs of Jean Monnet. Jean Monnet was a founding father of the European Union, our great project of peace. But did you know Jean Monnet was also a father of victory in the Second World War?
Jean Monnet helped Churchill and Roosevelt to prepare the so called “Victory Programme” – to ramp up military production in US to defeat the Nazis.
He would have recognised many of our current challenges. Jean Monnet also said: people only make great decisions when crisis is on their doorstep.
This is the greatest security crisis of our lifetimes. And we must now take the great decisions.
All of Europe is target of Russian aggression. We are all frontline Member States.
The White Paper is the basis for our industrial “Victory Programme”. Victory in defence of Peace on the European Continent.
White Paper and Rearm EU are just the beginning of our road. The road to the victory of peace and democracy in Europe.
And we shall prevail!
CLOSING REMARKS
Madam Chair, Honourable Members,
I would like to thank you for this historic debate, as I said at the very beginning.
Really, it’s very symbolic that we have this debate on this special day, both for me and my Lithuanian colleagues here in the Parliament and for the whole Lithuanian nation, on this, Lithuania’s Independence Day
In 1990 we regained our independence after 50 years of occupation by the Soviet empire. My message on this day is very clear: We Lithuanians don’t want to go through the same in the 21st century, another occupation and another Independence Day.
I don’t want my sons and my grandkids to face it, and I don’t want you in the left, in the center, in the right, kids and grandkids to face the fate of Ukrainian children.
That is why I wish all Lithuanians happy Independence Day from the 1990s.
And to all my friends in Europe, I want to say: independence is easy to lose but very hard to regain.
We must now be ready to defend our European independence.
I would like to remind that Russia, this year, in so called purchasing power parity terms, will spend for the war more than all of us in the European Union are going to spend.
I would remind also the numbers which NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte is always repeating:
Now at this moment, Russia, during three months, produces more weapons than all NATO Member States, including United States, Canada, Great Britain, Norway and us in the European Union are producing during one year.
We must really understand what does it mean, and that is why I want to thank all of you for your support during this discussion for Ukraine and for the defence of Europe.
Next week, we will present the White Paper on the Future of European Defence with a focus on investment capabilities and Defence industry.
We will continue our discussion, and we will put votes into action to deter aggression and prevent war.
Thank you very much.